 |
|
The author is
COO and president (US operations),
MindTree Consulting
|
|
|
It happened to me many years back on a visit
to Washington, DC, home to the most-visited monument
in the US, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial: "A
place to remember those who served during a turbulent
time in US history... a place for the nation to
heal its wounds." The memorial lists 58,226
names, in the order they died or were reported
missing. At the end of all those names, there
is a line that says: "This granite was imported
from Bangalore, India."
We have been a nation that supplied to the world
raw materials, rather than finished products -
granites, rather than the monument's design. The
world discovered us for spices in the 1st century
A.D. Since then, we have been spice-sellers to
the world. Meanwhile, McCormick dominates the
bottled spice business, and has pride of place
in supermarkets. While we export spices, who leads
the food business? The best chefs keep coming
from Italy.
After spices, it was the turn of Indian silk.
The world discovered that one in similar antiquity
- with the advent of the Silk Route. For centuries
we bred silkworms and spun silk, but who calls
the shots on the ramp? Versace, Giorgio Armani,
Chanel, Yves St Laurent. Then came software services.
For decades, most Indian companies have focussed
on supplying grey matter that is equivalent to
quarried granite and raw silk. This behaviour
is driven by a desire to live off the land, to
do what has the least risk and low value-add.
Not stopping there, the whole pharmaceutical industry
came up on the strength of the bulk drug business.
As a nation, we need to break that mould. Proponents
of continuity would argue that the raw material
mindset was critical to establish our presence
in the world market and that now we will automatically
go up the value chain. By itself, that assumption
is severely flawed.
Yves Doz is a world-renowned professor at INSEAD,
France. He explains that by doing something well,
you do not automatically graduate to the next
level. He argues that there are three layers of
value someone can add, and each of the three require
a different mindset. The lowest layer of value-add
is the technical, adaptive layer. Raw granite,
frozen shrimp, cotton bales and manpower: all
fall into this category. You have least risk,
least value-add, and lowest margins and highest
susceptibility here.
Then comes the experiential layer. Here, you do
not play on your ability to intermediate between
the access to raw material and the end user of
it. You 'step into the shoes' of the customer,
and create valuable products and services. Confronted
with the challenge of introducing a new car in
Europe, Nissan flew in its car designers to Frankfurt.
They rented different makes of cars and drove
2,500 km all over the continent to get a sense
of what it takes to be a motorist in Europe. Then
they went back to design a car for Europe. It
is not about a car. It is about stepping into
the shoes of a motorist to experientially feel
the need.
At the highest level is what Doz calls the existential
layer. This is where Sony or Mercedes Benz, or
Swatch operates. They not only know how to get
into the shoes of the customer, but as Doz says,
"they creep into the mind of the customer."
When a teenager in the Bronx or Mumbai or Tokyo
walks with a sway in his step after putting on
a pair of earphones, Sony knows what is going
on in his mind and works backward from there to
create products and services. Each layer we talked
about is separated from the other by a glass ceiling.
If these layers represent the so-called value
chain, the conclusion is that you do not go up
the value chain. You decide where you want to
be on the value chain, and perch yourself there.
India is on the cusp of interesting new times.
It appears that finally the butterfly will emerge
from the cocoon. In that emergence, we have the
golden opportunity to present ourselves as designers
of monuments, not suppliers of granite. I sense
that the break from the past is coming from very
unusual new directions. More about that next time.
|