You are here: Home > WEB EXCLUSIVE
 
Interview/Manish Kejriwal
'Asia is once again making a steady recovery'
Snigdha Sengupta
Feedback to this article | e-mail this article
MUMBAI-born Manish Kejriwal is currently the busiest private equity dealmaker in town, having taken charge recently at Temasek India Advisors, the Indian arm of Singapore-based investor Temasek Holdings. The former McKinsey partner, who was part of the global leadership team of the firm's private equity practice among other responsibilities, terms his entry into the private equity industry as a 'bit more entrepreneurial' compared to consulting. As managing director of Temasek he certainly doesn't have to try too hard to find deals; with $500 million already invested or committed to the Indian market, it is already the second-largest private equity investor in India, after Warburg Pincus.

In his first interview to the media after taking over in January this year, Kejriwal tells Snigdha Sengupta about Temasek's game plan for India:


How is Temasek's investment theme in India different from those of other Pan-Asian private equity funds that are active here?

Temasek's aim is to maximise long-term shareholder returns as an active investor and shareholder. This is what makes us different from the other Pan-Asian private equity funds active in India. The fact that we are not structured as a fund means we can afford to take a long view on investments, as we do not need to divest our holdings within a certain period of time -- we have a lot of flexibility in our investments. As a supportive, long-term shareholder we are prepared to work with our portfolio companies to build sustainable value.

Furthermore, unlike other funds, we do not have a fixed allocation in terms of investment amounts. What is more important to us is to put our money where we see value, and where we feel we can be a partner for growth. The fact that we are a majority shareholder in many companies, which are regional and global leaders, also allows us to draw on our shared experience and networks.

What kept you from entering the Indian market as a direct investor before 2003?

After surviving the 1997 economic crisis, 9/11 and SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), Asia is once again making a steady recovery and we are optimistic about its medium and long-term prospects. Like the rest of Asia, India too is on the rise and is an important node in our overall interest in India. With growth rates of between 7-8 per cent, a government committed to reform and many good companies with the potential to take on the world, India holds great promise and is an economy we want to contribute to and participate in.

We are beginning to see greater business opportunities with the rise of the middle class and increasing consumer sophistication. Sectors such as banking, finance, telecom, healthcare and education are expected to enjoy good growth prospects, as demands for services rise parallel with India's greater prosperity and spending power.

Temasek has also invested in a couple of funds in India. Which are these funds, and what is the role of these investments in your strategy for India?

In addition to investing directly in companies, Temasek is also continuously evaluating opportunities to invest in funds with an India focus. In August 2003 it co-invested with Standard Chartered Bank in the $100 million Merlion India Fund, which aims to provide capital to promising small Indian companies looking to expand in India and overseas. It has also invested in WestBridge Capital, focusing on early stage companies in the technology sector. These investments are in keeping with Temasek's philosophy of looking at emerging global leaders from India, promising companies with a distinctive intellectual property, world-class competitive strengths and the potential to scale up beyond their domestic market.

The Singapore government also invests in India through arms like the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC). How would Temasek execute its own investment strategy independent of GIC and funds like Merlion and WestBridge?

Temasek Holdings is registered under the Companies Act of Singapore. Our major investment decisions are authorised by our board, which comprises a majority of independent directors with extensive commercial track record. Operating and other investment decisions are responsibilities of our management teams.

We make our investments strictly on commercial merits. Our investments are not directed by the Singapore government, and we also do not invest jointly with the GIC that has a very different mandate from Temasek Holdings. We are a long-term shareholder and investor, while GIC operates as a fund management company.

Merlion India Fund is just one of the funds with an India focus that we are investing in as part of our overall strategy in India. There is no government participation in the Merlion India Fund. It was started by Temasek Holdings and Standard Chartared Private Equity. Currently, the fund is actively managed by Standard Chartered Private Equity.

As a strategic investor with a longer investment horizon how would you push through co-investment deals with other Pan-Asian funds that are more exit driven over a shorter horizon?

As far as possible we would seek like-minded co-investors. We are open to co-investing with other funds active in India and in the region. We are currently looking at a couple of investment with some of the other leading private equity investors. Finally, we are also open to co-investing with other Indian and non-Indian companies in opportunities that could potentially provide us attractive returns.

Is there an upper and lower limit on the equity stake you would pick up in each investment?

No, there isn't a minimum or maximum cap on the equity stake we choose to take. What is more important to us is that we are able to invest in companies with good potential, at the right price and time and who see us as a partner for growth.

Temasek is not structured as a typical private equity fund. How does this benefit the fund's own operations and your investee companies?

The fact that we are not structured as a fund means that we can afford to take a long-term view on investments as we do not need to divest our holdings within a certain period of time. Our investee companies tend to appreciate us as a supportive, long-term shareholder since they recognise that we are prepared to work with them to build sustainable value and not just divest when the going is bad.

 
Share your comments
 
 
Design Excellence Awards